Cited sector bands, not opinion
Every industry band traces back to the Damodaran NYU Stern Working Capital Requirements dataset or a named textbook with page references. No 'based on observation' claims.
See source registryLiquidity assessment in 5 inputs. Industry benchmarks cited to the Damodaran NYU Stern dataset (last update January 2026). No email capture.
Verified June 2026 against Corporate Finance Institute.
Damodaran band for this sector: 1.2 to 2.5
Acme SaaS Co. (illustrative example, not a real company). Numbers chosen to demonstrate the calculation on a software balance sheet.
The quick ratio (also called the acid-test ratio) divides a company's most-liquid current assets (cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable) by its current liabilities. A ratio of 1.0 means the company can cover every dollar of short-term debt without selling inventory. Healthy bands depend on industry: software firms commonly sit at 1.2 to 2.5, pharmaceuticals at 1.5 to 3.0, and grocery retailers at 0.2 to 0.6.
Verified June 2026. Source: Corporate Finance Institute. Formula triangulated with Subramanyam, Financial Statement Analysis, 11th Edition, pp. 499-505.
Industry bands triangulated from the Damodaran NYU Stern Working Capital Requirements dataset (US, last update January 2026) and Subramanyam Financial Statement Analysis (11th Edition).
| Industry | Expected quick ratio | Inventory / Sales | AR / Sales | Non-cash WC / Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software (System and Application) | 1.2 to 2.5 | 0.46% | 16.84% | 10.05% |
| Computer Services | 1.0 to 2.0 | 8.12% | 21.30% | 13.40% |
| Retail (General) | 0.2 to 0.6 | 8.67% | 3.50% | -0.11% |
| Healthcare Products | 1.5 to 3.5 | 17.59% | 16.51% | 25.65% |
| Drugs (Pharmaceutical) | 1.5 to 3.0 | 15.61% | 21.80% | 32.09% |
| Construction Supplies | 1.0 to 2.0 | 20.95% | 14.83% | 22.56% |
| Auto and Truck | 0.7 to 1.2 | 9.91% | 6.30% | -2.96% |
| Restaurant and Dining | 0.3 to 0.8 | 2.17% | 5.32% | 2.79% |
| Hotel and Gaming | 0.4 to 1.0 | 2.62% | 10.36% | 0.77% |
| Telecom Services | 0.5 to 1.0 | 2.04% | 12.83% | -3.69% |
| Banks (Regional) | Not meaningful | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Financial Services (Non-bank and Insurance) | Not meaningful | 0.36% | 1332.22% | 1186.00% |
Verified June 2026. Source: Damodaran NYU Stern, Working Capital Requirements by Industry Sector. US companies, last update January 2026.
Every industry band traces back to the Damodaran NYU Stern Working Capital Requirements dataset or a named textbook with page references. No 'based on observation' claims.
See source registryEach page opens with a single-sentence answer in a labelled card so AI engines and human readers get the conclusion before the workings.
Read methodologyNo sign-up, no sponsored vendors, no affiliate links. The output is yours; the methodology is on the methodology page.
About this siteA quick ratio at or above 1.0 is generally considered healthy because it means a company can cover all current liabilities from cash, marketable securities, and receivables without selling inventory. Acceptable levels vary by industry: software firms typically sit between 1.2 and 2.5, while grocery retailers can operate safely between 0.2 and 0.6 because their inventory turns rapidly and sales are in cash.
The quick ratio excludes inventory and prepaid expenses from the numerator, focusing only on assets that can be converted to cash within roughly 90 days. The current ratio includes all current assets. For inventory-heavy industries the current ratio can mask liquidity stress that the quick ratio reveals. Both ratios are usually read alongside the cash conversion cycle.
Yes. Acid-test ratio and quick ratio are interchangeable names for the same calculation: (Cash + Marketable Securities + Accounts Receivable) divided by Current Liabilities. The term acid-test comes from the 19th-century assayer's test for gold purity.
Yes. A very high quick ratio (above 3.0 for most non-pharma industries) can signal that the company is holding excess cash or receivables instead of reinvesting in growth, paying down debt, or returning capital to shareholders. Equity analysts often flag persistently high quick ratios as evidence of capital allocation drift.
No. Banks and insurance companies are regulated on capital and liquidity coverage frameworks (CET1, Liquidity Coverage Ratio, Net Stable Funding Ratio) rather than balance-sheet ratios designed for industrial firms. The Damodaran dataset confirms financial-sector working capital is structurally different and the quick ratio is not a meaningful indicator.